July 6, 2005
Book short: Blink
Where The Tipping Point theorizes about how humans relate to each other and how fads start and flourish in our society, Blink theorizes about how humans make decisions and about the interplay between the subconscious, learned expertise, and real-time inputs. But Gladwell does more than theorize — he has plenty of real world examples which seem quite plausible, and he peppers the book with evidence from some (though hardly a complete coverage of relevant) scientific and quasi-scientific studies.
Blink for Entrepreneurs/CEOs: What’s the most critical lesson in Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink, as it relates to entrepreneurs/CEOs? It’s about bias in hiring. Most of us make judgments about potential new hires quite quickly in the initial interview. The symphony example in the book is the most painfully poignant — most major symphony orchestras hired extremely few women until they started conducting auditions behind a screen. It’s not clear to me yet how to stop or even shrink hiring bias, but I suspect the answer lies in pre-interview work around defining specific criteria for the job and scoring all candidates on the same set of criteria.
Blink for VCs: What’s the most critical lesson in Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink, as it relates to VCs? It’s about picking companies to back. Even VCs who are virtuosos, as Gladwell would call them, can make poor judgments on companies to back based on their own personal reaction to a company’s product or service, as opposed to the broader marketplace’s reaction. Someone poured a whole lot of money into Webvan, Pets.com, eToys, and the like.
Blink for Marketers: What’s the most critical lesson in Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink, as it relates to Marketers? It’s the importance of multivariate regression testing. No, really, I’m not kidding, although there’s no doubt a less math-y way of saying it — “test everything.” The Coca-Cola Company thought they were doing the right thing in creating New Coke because they were losing the Pepsi Challenge. But what they didn’t realize was that Pepsi (unintentionally or not) had suckered them into believing that the single-sip test was cause for reengineering a century of product, when in reality Coke was probably just being out-advertised. Christian Brothers Brandy was going out of its mind losing market share to competitor E&J until someone realized that they just needed to change the shape of their bottle.